Fantasy Hockey League Disputes, they’ve become the stuff of legends.

Back in 2007, shortly after hoisting the Cup with his Anaheim Duck teammates, Dustin Penner signed an (ill-advised) offer sheet with the Edmonton Oilers. This was so long ago that Penner was actually considered an impact player for the Ducks, and to say that then-Ducks' GM Brian Burke took exception to the Oilers' tactics would be an understatement.

After trading barbs with Oilers' GM Kevin Lowe through the media, Burke went all schoolyard on him, challenging him to a barn fight in Lake Placid. Actually, Burke issued the challenge by sending Lowe a message through his buddy Glen Sather, the NHL equivalent of asking the kid next to you to pass a note to the guy behind him.

When Gary Bettman inevitably got wind of the showdown, he missed a golden opportunity to turn it into a pay-per-view spectacular that could have generated enough revenue to avoid the lockout of 2012, and regrettably pulled the plug on it with threats of lengthy suspensions. Something about the integrity of the game. Pffffttt.

One of the least fun aspects of being a commissioner, whether in real life or in fantasy, is dealing with disputes between rival managers. Whether the arguments arise out of shady trade dealings, skirting the edge of the rules, or questionable in-game strategies, when two or more owners are at each other's throat, the wise commissioner must diffuse the situation before it engulfs the league. It takes a delicate touch.

Here are a few strategies to help you navigate these tricky waters, listed in ever-widening circles. Because there's such a wide range of disputes, and every league is unique, I'll let you decide which is most appropriate for dealing with your next controversy.

Commissioner as Benevolent Dictator: One option is for the commissioner to act as an independent mediator. Let both sides present their case, review your league rules, think through the precedents that you may be setting, and make a binding decision. This is often the easiest way to put out small fires, but be warned: when you go this route, you could be setting yourself up for some serious vitriol. The "loser" in this situation may not look upon you too kindly, and others could accuse you of acting out of self-interest. It is critical that you set aside any interest that your own team might have in the outcome of the case, and act in the best interests of the league. Sometimes that's easier said than done.

Strike a Committee: To distribute power and ensure you're not blinded by self-interest, you might consider creating a committee of three owners to review the situation with you. This may be a permanent panel, or it may be assembled and dissolved on a case-by-case basis. Whether you actually give them voting rights in the matter or just use them as a sounding board is up to you. It's essential that you pick the right people for this task – managers who have little at stake in the dispute and a proven ability to look at things clearly and without bias. You may open yourself to charges of favouritism, but if you choose owners who are well-respected within your league, hopefully you can avoid this danger.

Previous

Next

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Related Posts

Gallery

Industry Experts League Draft Summary

October 12th, 2015|0 Comments

Gallery

Expansion Teams in Dynasty Leagues: A Case Study

April 23rd, 2015|0 Comments

Gallery

Reality Check Part 3: The Masked Men

August 30th, 2014|0 Comments

Gallery

Reality Check, Part Two: A Case for the Defense

August 12th, 2014|0 Comments