Ramblings – Sid delivers OT winner, a look to the 2016-17 Caps and more (May 17)
Neil Parker
2016-05-17
Sidney Crosby silences his doubters, Washington's outlook for next season and a mix of news and notes, including a look at the goalie-starved Kings …
***
Game 2 started with a four spot in the first period, and the first whistle was the result of a goal.
It was an exciting game throughout, but the scoring dried up.
Through regulation, the biggest fantasy observations were Jonathan Drouin doing Drouin, and Justin Schultz's play.
Here is what Mike Sullivan had to say about Schultz before the game Monday:
"Justin Schultz is a good player. I've said this all along. What he's brought to our team is his mobility, his ability to make a first pass. He sees the ice pretty well. He has good offensive instincts. He can help us on the power play. He joins the rush extremely well."
The quote was originally posted here, before the article was update. It seems odd to edit out the quote, but regardless, Schultz was solid for Pittsburgh through regulation Monday with three scoring chances and five shot attempts.
Assuming, as a restricted free agent, he re-signs with Pittsburgh, Schultz's fantasy value is going to skyrocket. He fits with the Penguins, and he seems to always be open off the rush. Plus, he appears to have the backing of his coach and is a competent power-play quarterback. Buy now, folks.
The fourth period of the game ended quickly with Sidney Crosby scoring his first career playoff-overtime goal.
Interestingly, there is more on that subject to follow.
***
This wrap-up piece is a few days old now, but there are some interesting tidbits about the Capitals, and their prospects for next season.
The collected expectations of the team and strong sense of underachievement registered. Additionally, it seemed like a strong group internally.
Obviously, you never want to over scrutinize a fluff piece and extract fantasy analysis from it, but a quick look at the 2016-17 roster makes Washington nothing but contenders again next year.
There is plenty of cap space to re-up Marcus Johansson, Tom Wilson, Dmitry Orlov and Michael Latta, which leaves unrestricted free agents Jason Chimera and Mike Richards unsigned.
Chimera might be looking for a payday, but he is unlikely to land in a better situation, and at 37, why look elsewhere? Chimera expects to be back with the Caps.
Richards isn't a needle mover, and he likely won't return to the team.
So, as far as our fantasy pursuits are concerned, this is a team to stock pile from again.
Outside of points-only formats, Alex Ovechkin remains the No. 1 fantasy player next fall, and Braden Holtby is the No. 1 goalie, right?
Nicklas Backstrom, Evgeny Kuznetsov and John Carlson are top-tier-to-excellent options at their positions, and Matt Niskanen, Jason Williams and T.J. Oshie are roster locks.
Andre Burakovsky, Marcus Johansson and Philipp Grubauer are also likely to be owned in the majority of leagues.
What could happen, here, though, is that because the Capitals failed, again, there is more profit room baked into the perceived fantasy value of the secondary scorers.
This sounds simple enough, but it is often overlooked. In fantasy football, we want players attached to high-powered offenses, and in fantasy baseball the benefits of Coors Field have a tremendous impact on hitters. You want players attached to Washington next season.
They're going to have another monster regular season, and what happened this May or what happens next May doesn't impact your fantasy season next year. Load up where you can and hope to grab some discounts.
***
Sticking with the Capitals, Washington Post beat Isabelle Khurshudyan tweeted out a number of quotes from general manager Brian MacLellan Monday.
Overall, MacLellan is happy with the core group, and will just be looking for minor tweaks to the supporting pieces, which he dubbed the ninth and/or 10th forward.
Here are a few of the tweets that didn't make it to the article:
MacLellan said Vrana projects as a top-six player. "I don’t know that next year’s necessarily the time for him, but we'll take a look."
— Isabelle Khurshudyan (@ikhurshudyan) May 16, 2016
More on Vrana from this week's The Journey.
MacLellan mentioned Chandler Stephenson as a guy who's "coming."
— Isabelle Khurshudyan (@ikhurshudyan) May 16, 2016
Chandler Stephenson was mentioned in both the article and the above tweet. His fantasy upside is limited, though, and he likely will serve in a fourth-line role, if he even cracks the club.
Stash Stephenson away as a long-term flier in cavernous keeper/dynasty formats.
MacLellan said the team missed Joel Ward. Plan going forward is to turn Tom Wilson into a Joel Ward-type player.
— Isabelle Khurshudyan (@ikhurshudyan) May 16, 2016
Obviously, Tom Wilson elevating his game to a Joel Ward level seems to be asking a lot on the surface, but it isn't out of the question, either.
Wilson has seen extensive time with Jay Beagle and Jason Chimera during his three-year career. That isn't an offensively favorable trio, yet Wilson has improved his points-per-game mark and shots per game in each of the past two seasons, which aligns with his increase in ice time.
The biggest reason for suggesting Wilson could increase his production and jump 10 points is the potential of him jumping up the depth chart. There is some offensive upside here, albeit in the 30-35 point range.
Washington used its 2012 first-round selection on him, and the 2016-17 season will likely be the stage to find out if he can take another step forward. It'll be worth keeping tabs on the buzz around Wilson this summer, especially his new contract terms.
***
Yohann Auvitu is generating interesting from multiple teams, according to Darren Dreger.
I posted in the forum asking for info.
***
There were a couple of signings Monday.
Marcus Sorensen signed a one-year contract with the San Jose Sharks.
Here is a snap-shot analysis of Sorensen from Elite Prospects:
"An offensively skilled forward. Sörensen is a good skater and has fine puckhandling ability and soft hands. A pretty good scorer with some creativity. Of average size, but plays pretty big and gets involved physically"
I bet the Dobber Prospects dudes have something on him shortly.
*
And, Nashville signed Justin Kirkland to an entry-level contract Monday.
***
Here is a snippet from a question and answer from Red Wings beat Ansar Khan of MLive.com.
Q: Do you know the status of Johan Franzen? Is he done or is there a chance to see him back in a Red Wings jersey? – Johannes
A: I think it's safe to assume he's done. I'd expect him to spend the final four seasons of his contract on long-term injured reserve, like Chris Pronger and Marc Savard. Franzen attended Game 5 of the Tampa Bay series and said his condition hasn't changed; he still experiences concussion symptoms on a regular basis whenever he tries to exert himself.
Franzen was an overrated fantasy contributor with just one 30-goal showing, and he also never hit the 60-point mark. However, he was consistently battling various ailments and had his best season at age 29. With those two factors in mind, his points-per-game mark was solid (0.61).
Plus, Franzen was at his best was in the spring. He posted 42 goals and 39 assists through 107 playoff games. He's a prime example of why we have to be wary of over emphasising postseason production.
Sometimes players are just solid during the regular season but absolute beasts (or mules) in the playoffs.
***
Here is a quality read about the void of goaltending depth in the Los Angeles system.
With Jonathan Quick locked up for the next seven seasons, there isn't a lot of upward fantasy value here, but Jhonas Enroth is an unrestricted free agent, and Peter Budaj is the only other goal under contract for the 2016-17 season, according to GeneralFanager.com.
The Kings are a team clinging to competitiveness, so while this isn't a full endorsement to go grab Budaj this summer in cavernous keeper/dynasty leagues, he's an extremely cost-effective No. 2 goalie option for the Kings at just $600,000 against the cap.
And with 20 starts, Budaj would have value in the majority of seasonal leagues, that is if you believe Los Angeles will be a top-third team again next year, of course.
Personally, I suspect they're heading in the wrong direction but could escpae next year with another solid campaign. Nonetheless, they need a No. 2 goalie, and we need to keep tabs on who it is going to be.
***
During Prime Time Sports with Bob McCown Monday, Glenn Healy called out Sidney Crosby for having just one goal in his past 19 home games, and then said the only positive for Crosby playing with Connor Sheary and Bryan Rust is that he doesn't have to play with Phil Kessel.
I'm assuming Healey meant home playoff games because Crosby entered the game Monday with seven goals through his latest 19 home games, and through his seven home playoff games this year, Crosby has a goal and six assists. The Penguins were also 5-2 at home in the playoffs before Monday.
I wonder if Healey knows Kessel is a point-per-game player in the playoffs during his career?
Or that Kessel had 20 goals and 31 assists through his past 57 games dating back to the regular season before the game Monday?
Then, Healy said the Lightning were the Stanley Cup favorites. His analysis was Crosby can't score goals at home, so Tampa Bay is better. Nice.
The Kessel jab was clearly an attempt at humor, but combined with the cracks at Crosby it highlights the far-to-common focus on cutting both down.
Since 2011-12, Kessel has been an elite scorer outside of the 2015 calendar year. During that span, he was just a far-better-than-most scorer. This isn't low-hanging fruit, either, it is stapling the blame of a once-reeling franchise onto the one player who never missed a game through his final five years and scored 151 goals with 188 assists over 376 games.
For Healy to pinpoint Corsby's lack of goals is absorbed given he is a point-per-game player at home and the captain of a team that had won five of seven home games this spring. I could understand the narrative if the theme was a lack of scoring, but Crosby's been solid. And Pittsburgh is now 6-2 at home this spring, and Crosby has two goals and six assists.
Kessel has six goals, eight assists and a plus-4 rating with a postivie CorsiFor percentage (50.3 percent at five-on-five) through 13 playoff games this year.
It was lazy and short-sighted analysis and it's been overdone. Aim higher.
***
Say, what?
"If I were Sidney Crosby right now, I'd watch the work ethic that Jonathan Drouin has on a nightly basis." – @Jeremy_Roenick
— NBC Sports PR (@NBCSportsPR) May 17, 2016
***
Before we leave …
That was Sidney Crosby's first playoff OT winner. Fun fact: Mario Lemieux never had one.
— Chris Johnston (@reporterchris) May 17, 2016
Thanks for tuning in, and be well, Dobberheads.
46 Comments
Leave A Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I wouldn’t rush out to buy JSchultz yet based on those comments. If the coach truly believed in Schultz, he wouldn’t be scratching him in the playoffs. Those are just media clips to get people talking and to hopefully bolster his confidence.
He is essentially free right now and has 40-point upside, and he is passing the eye test. No-brainer buy/add. Schultz is likely floating on the waiver wire in most leagues.
Upside doesn’t always equate to actual, especially when we are talking about a guy who has already spent five seasons in the league. Playing as the #1 in Edmonton, he never came close to 40 pts (career high 33pts) so I don’t see him coming close to 40 pts playing in a secondary role (at best) behind Letang in Pitts. If he gets you 30 points going fwd, I’d call that a success at this stage.
Don’t forget, most defensemen don’t do squat until they’re 27. Pronger never had 50 points until he was 27. I think Kaberle didn’t hit 50 until he was 28 if I remember correctly
Absolutely, but those guys moved into prime roles to see their production increase. Schultz isn’t getting those prime minutes anymore like he was in Edmonton, and as long as he’s in Pittsburgh, he wont get them there either. I am not too sure teams are ready to trust him with those types of situations anytime soon again. He simply hasn’t proven that he is capable of being “the guy” in the league yet. Quite the opposite really.
Being behind Letang isn’t exactly the worst place to be, either. He’s topped 75 games once in his career.
True, but I’ve watched Schultz enough in Edmonton to know just how bad he can be, moreso than just how good he can be. I am not buying Sullivan’s comments as anything more than media propaganda.
He’s not only behind Letang but Daley. Maatta will be healthy next season & the only reason Maatta isn’t playing now is he’s simply not fit to play, the only reason Schultz is even dressing. Daley; 1:55, had more PP time than Schultz; 1:20, last night.
This conversation is a waste of time. Schultz won’t even be retained by Pittsburgh. They paid a 3rd round pick to buy insurance for a playoff run. A 3rd round pick is essentially worthless & Pittsburgh couldn’t afford Schultz even if they wanted to which they don’t.
2016: “Maatta will be healthy next season…”
2006: “Gaborik will be healthy next season…”
1996: “Forsberg will be healthy next season…”
…
haha
I’m not buying that opinion, post what ever you wish to call it. Pronger was 25 when he hit 50, 62 actually in 99-2000. The season prior he had 46 in 67. T. Kaberle only had 3 50 point seasons in his entire 15 year NHL career.
50 points puts you into superstar status for Dman. 12 D had more than 50 points last season, 11 in 2014-15, 9 in 2013-14, Zero in 2012-13 the lock out year, 5 in 2011-12, 9 in 2010-11. That’s an unrealistic threshold to sell your argument. As a very minuscule % are ever going to ever break that threshold regardless of age. Less than 5% of Dman to ever play the game in today’s lower scoring NHL.
40 points would be a far more realistic threshold for points by Dman to determine their breakthrough & or significant contribution at their position in points but then your argument has ZERO validity but at a 50 point threshold it had ZERO regardless. In 2015-16 26 Dman had at least 40 points, 2014-15 27, 2013-14 26, 2011-12 19 & 2010-11 28.
Last season 200 Dman played a minimum of 37 games, at a 40 point threshold, slightly more than 13% broke that threshold putting them in pretty elite company essntially the top 10% in points at their position 230 Dman played at least 20 games in the NHL last season. The vast majority that broke that threshold, 40 points did so long before 27. The age for the vast majority at least 80% of those that will ever break that 40 point threshold will do so at 24 or 25 years of age depending upon when their birthday falls in the hockey season.
Extrapolating that raw data even further as at no time in the last 6 years have more than 30 Dman scored more than 40 points your saying Schultz will make the top 30 in scoring at D next season? Ha-ha! Not a chance in Hell.
Not even every team had 1 Dman to crack 40 points & there are only 30 teams. A few teams have the luxury of having multiple players that scored more than 40 points last season but they are very few, Nas 2, Cal 3, LA 2, & Mtl 2. That means only 22 teams had a Dman score more than 40 points.
For Schultz to have any hope of scoring 40 point next season he would need to play as a #1 Dman both in TOI/GP & PP TOI/GP for what ever team he signs with as a UFA. NO team is going to give Schultz that opportunity next season. He had that opportunity essentially for 5 years in Edmonton & couldn’t break that threshold & now you expect it to happen next season? All I can do is laugh & wish I was playing in your hockey pools.
Schultz is to young to write off & if his confidence can be rebuilt some where he might 1 day crack 40 points but his opportunities to do so will be limited moving forward. 2 maybe 3 more kicks at the can. He’ll sign a 1 year show me deal some where for about 2.5 & see some PP time but what team in the NHL today is going to make him their #1 PP Dman next season? I can only think of 1 NJ & he isn’t getting 40 points playing for NJ.
Striker – my mistake, he was 25
You said my argument has zero validity, and then you insult me by capitalizing the word “zero”. Really? Zero? Zero percent? Zero? You’d bet all of your savings and your life against it? Zero? It’s not worth it to speak in absolutes like that, because it costs you nothing to allow for .1% chance…but it costs you everything to be wrong after saying the word “zero”.
“50 points puts you into superstar status for dman” – Your opinion. “Unrealistic threshold” – that statement doesn’t make sense, on the heels of your providing data stating otherwise.
Kaberle “only” broke 50 three times. “Only”? Really? How many times would you like a d-man you own to hit 50? Ten times? Twelve? LOL
Here is my opinion – Justin Schultz will probably be a bust. He’ll get one more season and likely get 25-30 points, and then struggle for contract in 2017. BUT, if we’re talking about “upsides” and “maybes” then he “could” get 50 points. In fact, if healthy he either gets 50 points within two seasons (3% chance) or he’s out of the league in two seasons (97% chance). There will be no middle ground (other than an injury). Take “my” opinion as you will, but don’t tell me it has zero validity.
PS – my opinions are never for sale to you. I know you won’t buy any of them, so I’m not selling.
I’ll gladly take that bet. Schultz at 50 points at any point his career in 1 season. If my bookie would give me that bet at even low odds, 2 to 1 I’m in for at least 5 K if not 10. If the odds are even better & they should be I’d bet more.
Your argument about 27 years of age for what I assume you were implying was a breakthrough for Dman to hit 50 points had ZERO merit. To few Dman actually hit that # & you were making that argument well supporting Neil trying to sell Schultz as a 40 point Dman. I’d take that bet as well.
I didn’t offer a bet, and I don’t have an argument of 27 years of age. Don’t assume and don’t imply please. Geez, you come down hard every day with “exact” stats that refute a tiny piece of data we say…and then one sentence later you assume and imply things. Makes sense…
I just finished saying that my odds were 3%. How on earth do you think that means I’m taking bets that he’ll get 50? You’re losing me rapidly here…
Neil wasn’t trying to sell Schultz as a 40 point dman either. That’s it, I’m making up words that you “said”
Your argument that 27-year-old defensemen never get 40 points is flat out wrong and has ZERO merit. I’ll take that bet right now
I never said that. Ha-ha!
All good no ill will intended. Enjoy the site & most of the writers, Neil certainly being 1 I enjoy & yourself. Only 2 I find to dry. You both have enjoyable writing styles just on occasion shock me with the odd comment that I take you to task for. Again no ill will intended.
These are worthwhile discussions, and it wouldn’t be a very fun game if we all agreed, would it.?
I think his upside is higher than that. 40 points is more his ‘likely’ if he gets it together and sticks in the NHL
Careful, don’t take Roenick’s Crosby comment out of context. He had just finished showing some video examples of lazy play on Sid’s part, which appeared perfectly valid to me – though of course I am no expert. And you have to admit, Drouin has had rockets in his skates in the playoffs. I love that he is not afraid to hit bigger guys. He understands momentum – he might be little, but he gets going fast and slams them.
I only saw the Tweet. With that said, there is a difference between lazy and conserving energy or limiting excess roaming, etc. Pinpointing a few examples of Crosby potentially not giving 100 percent sort of furthers the obsession with nitpicking his game. And no doubt, Drouin is playing at a high level right now.
I’m among the Schultz/40pts skeptics. Reminds me of the hype surrounding Ehrhoff when he became a Pen, and the guy — unlike Schultz he had 3 plus-40 seasons and the preceeding two was just a touch below that — scored at a 23-point pace. Schultz couldn’t break 35 playing on a first unit with excellent offensive players, how could he do better playing with second-stringers like Kunitz and bonino for the last 30 sex of pp2 — and that’s the best case scenario. 40 points only happens if Letang goes down for a lengthy period AND Schultz emerges as #1 in his stead.
Healy seems to think abrasive+sarcastic=analysis. I don’t understand why he is still employed.
Agreed with Healy analysis. But, so far no one is crediting Schultz for his 45-point pace during the lockout-shortened season. It was also his rookie year — he deserves a pass for his time in Edmonton.
He won’t get 40 points. We’re only saying he “could”. He has more of a chance of getting 40 points than I do, for example… ;)
But if the stars align and the situation is right, hell I still think he “could” get 50 or even 55. Odds are 1%, but just speaking in “coulds” and “maybes”…
Pittsburgh can’t even afford to qualify Schultz baring a significant trade. Pittsburgh has less than 100K in cap space next season if the cap comes in at 74 million. Schultz’s qualifying offer has to be 3.9 million.
If he has so much of the coaches confidence why has he only played 4 of 13 playoff games? Last night where your glowing about his play he played a whopping 13:32 which was good for 5th by Dman in Pittsburgh 4 seconds more ice time than Cole.
Schultz barely played after being acquired at the trade deadline. Even if Pittsburgh moves Fleury they aren’t paying Schultz 3.9 million per season. He won’t be qualified & will then walk as a UFA as someone will offer him more than Pittsburgh is prepaired to pay him.
My advice, avoid Schultz like the plague. There are far safer options to draft.
What does safety have to do with anything? There are 100 defensemen capable of 20-30 points. Not many can approach 40 and 50, Schultz had five shot attempts and three scoring chances in 13 minutes. It’s not about how much ice time, either. Power-play looks and eight offensive zone starts vs three defensive. Target upside. He was brought in as depth, and is currently playing extremely well in limited minutes. It’s not like I said he was going to win the Norris.
You told people to “Buy now, folks.” I said there are safer options, that’s what safety has to do with it. No 1 should waste a roster sport or draft pick on Schultz until fodder range. I wouldn’t waste the roster spot even then. Dobber chimed in supporting your argument with a bogus threshold trying to imply or sell that Schultz shouldn’t reach his; Dobber’s, 50 point threshold until 27. I say BS.
See supporting stats.
Yes, because the price is free and there is no risk in grabbing Schultz now. There was no league context. Perhaps, I should have added “in deep keeper/dynasty formats.” But, still, no one is dropping a valuable player for Schultz, I didn’t think I needed to place him in the context as anything more than a gamble.
The league context is implied…you can’t buy now in a 1 year format.
Keep on keepin on Neil…
Thanks, man.
I say BS to your supporting stats. Where were those stats for Mark Streit? Stats are pretty, but things happen. Keep in mind I have a Degree in statistics and a Minor in mathematics so I’m well aware of how nice and neat the numbers can be, I don’t need a lecture. These English majors waltz into my (stats) domain convinced they know it all. Bothers me.
I did not state a threshold, let alone a 50 point threshold. So stop putting words in my mouth. If you really want a threshold for Schultz, one that I would bet my house against him topping, I would say 80 points. There’s your “threshold”. I won’t risk my house on a points-ceiling that is any lower than that.
Ha-ha!
I have a PHD in Chemical Engineering myself & in live in a finite world. Like you, I took a ton of stats & odds of probabilities classes & a shit load of math, chemistry & physics in my 7 years of University & 5 years spent researching & writing my thesis.
All I was saying is you were implying that Dman don’t hit 50 points generally until 27. My argument is few do regardless of age & I supported that with the # of D that have actually scored more than 50 points in the last 5 seasons not counting the lock out season. On average 10 a year.
Not a huge issue. Again we agree to disagree. You made a point, I countered, now we debate but like you there comes a point where debate is a waste of time. Sometimes it’s far easier to say yep bad example.
I recently had to send Jim Rutherford an open apology as I had slagged his personal decisions for years. I was wrong & not just by a little. When I stick my foot up my ass I accept it & say so. Ha-ha!
Enough said.
“These English majors waltz into my (stats) domain convinced they know it all. Bothers me.”
That comment is incredibly ignorant.
You don’t have a corner on math Dobber. There are some English majors I know of who could teach a university math course.
And consider some English majors support your site and have for years and years.
What an idiotic thing to say. Fortunately I didn’t plunk down money yet for your guides of which I buy every year.
I agree it is ignorant. It’s ignorant both ways. You’re not in my shoes, lcbtd and I’m offended that you would call me out on this. If you care to email me I’d be happy to give you some background on that comment and my right to say it seriously.
But. In this case I wasn’t.
It was tongue in cheek, joking around, blustering over a beer at a pub and Striker knows it. But if it wasn’t – I can’t believe you would begrudge me the right to say it (and again, feel free to email for the background).
If you want to win, you’ll let me do my trash talk – joking or otherwise – and buy the best Guide out there. And smile at the great deal you’re getting ;)
PS – those English majors you speak of that support my site aren’t waltzing. So they have nothing to do with my statement ;)
Email sent – I just used your Contact Us form.
To make a long story short – Dobber, you get a game misconduct for hitting from behind! lol
Can’t believe that was Sid’s first ever overtime playoff goal, good timing though. And super Mario never had one, now that is shocking to me, that is a fun fact Mr.Chris Johnston! I like many others want to see two game 7’s in the conference finals!
Thanks for reading, man. Be well!
I’m in a dynasty league, and the way I’d approach Schultz is pretty simple. I’d wait until our league draft, and then see if I could buy cheap on Justin. I’d do so in the hopes he starts off at a high pace next year, and then look to move him for a profit, and fast. I don’t believe in Justin Schultz the player, but I do believe in extracting value out of flipping cheap acquisitions. So the ramblings are correct in you take it from that perspective. If you’re taking the ramblings to mean “Buy Schultz now and expect him to be a 40 or 50 point Dman”, then I think you are misinterpreting things very badly.
Agreed.
In my keeper league (full keeper) if I could acquire Schultz for a 4th rounder (the lowest draft pick available) then that’s a steal of a price to take the risk. If he started off hot though I’d be tempted to keep him. If not, then he’s a dropsy next year. Only cost me a 4th.
Acquiring him at a 4th is my exact line of thinking. It’s a very small price for a shot at his potential, and it’s not a prospect Dman that you’re waiting on for 3-5 years (minimum). If it doesn’t work, you’ve essentially lost nothing. If there’s ever a time to buy and extract value from Schultz, then that time is now, and that’s what I took the ramblings to mean. Some people just want to be argumentative, that’s the way it goes.
Thanks for tuning in. That was my angle. Plus, I like what I’ve seen from him since joining Pittsburgh. The puck finds him because he is finding soft spots in the offensive zone — registering five shot attempts in limited minutes isn’t just a fluke. Small sample size or whatever, but he’s been solid.
Yea, I think Pitt has utilized him in a much better fashion than Edmonton. He’s not forced into a role that he’s not built to handle, and the numbers in Pitt show it. I personally don’t trust him, but there’s potential value there if you can get him at a good price.
Sidney scores a goal and all is right with the world. Because of his early juvenile behavior and entitlement, he has become the NHL’s most polarizing player. You either love him or hate him. The hockey writers don’t do him any favors in their “Greatest Player in the World” nonsense either. It only serves to bring negative attention to him. There must be immense pressure on this kid because any time he goes pointless the alarm bells ring and the media writes about it. Sidney is a young talented player for the Pittsburgh Penguins, same as other notable players past and present. Nothing more.
There is a 0% chance the Penguins make Schultz a qualifying offer in the neighborhood of $4 million, which means there is a 100% chance that he will be an UFA on July 1; which means that there’s about a 5% chance he’s on the Pens next year as there will almost certainly be better options for the Pens to allocate their limited cap-room dollars on the open market and likely better opportunities for Schultz to get more playing time elsewhere (a team like the Yotes, who have about 3 NHL defensemen, not much on the way in terms of NHL-ready prospects, and thus will be able to offer a great shot at a top-6 role as well that one-way deal that others won’t, comes to mind).
I agree with this, and I also think he signs for a cheap price in the $1.5 range