Reality Check, Part 2: A Case for the Defence

Glen Hoos




Ed. Note: This is the second instalment in a series in which we'll look at different aspects of the NHL game and how to value them appropriately in your fantasy league scoring, with the objective of creating scoring systems that reflect real life value as closely as possible. Click here for Part 1: The Power Game.


"Offence wins games; defence wins championships."



It's an oft-repeated sports maxim, and often true. But is it true in the fantasy realm? More to the point – should it be?


Historically, fantasy hockey has been the sole domain of the offensive-minded. As a Flames fan in the mid-90's, Phil Housley's frequent defensive blunders drove me absolutely up the wall; but as a fantasy manager, did I care? Not a bit! Keep putting up a point-a-game, Phil, and you can give the puck away in your own zone as often as you like!

As fantasy leagues have become more complex, things have changed. Wanting to reflect real hockey as closely as possible, many leagues have looked to incorporate a defensive element into their scoring system. But how is this best accomplished, and how much defence is too much?

Let's be honest: as much as we may value realism, most of us have no desire to see someone take home the championship employing the fantasy equivalent of the neutral zone trap. And yet, a couple well-chosen stat categories can round out a league and bring fantasy value to players who would otherwise be irrelevant. The question is, which categories?

As we weigh the options, it quickly becomes apparent that there is no one stat that defines the defensive game. Defence comes in many forms. The best defenceman of our generation, Nicklas Lidstrom, relies on impeccable positioning to take away the opponent's time and space – something that doesn't show up on a stats sheet. In Minnesota, Greg Zanon sacrifices his body time and again as the NHL's shot blocking king. Brent Seabrook locks things down by taking opponents out, as his 227 hits last se