May 7, 2015
Michael Clifford
2015-05-07
Rangers and Habs on the verge of being eliminated, while Chicago goes for a sweep. Thoughts on both the Jack Adams and Ted Lindsay awards.
****
As always, I'll have a thread open around noon at the Dobber Forums for any fantasy hockey (and general hockey) question. It's a chance for keeper questions, outlooks, or anything else on the mind of the reader.
****
The Jack Adams Trophy finalists (coach of the year) were named and it was Bob Hartley of the Flames, Peter Laviolette from the Predators, and Alain Vigneault of the Rangers finishing as the final three. Hartley led a thought-to-be non-contender to a playoff berth, Laviolette was behind the bench for a 16 point turn-around from last year, and Vigneault led the Rangers to a Presidents' Trophy. It's hard to argue with the results of all three.
I suppose the Jack Adams can best be described as "did most with least" award, for the most part. The last three winners are Ken Hitchcock (took a Blues team back to playoffs in 2012), Paul MacLean (PeskySens), and Patrick Roy (thanks Semyon Varlamov). Constant excellence is rarely rewarded, and playoffs are not, which is why Joel Quenneville and Darryl Sutter have none in the last five years despite four Stanley Cups, and Mike Babcock has none to his credit. For that reason, I would say Vigneault is unlikely to win. Hartley will probably win the trophy, and there's no real problem with that, but coaches like Jon Cooper in Tampa Bay, Bruce Boudreau in Anaheim, and Paul Maurice in Winnipeg are all worthy of mentions as well.
Chicago looks poised for another Stanley Cup run given their performance so far in the playoffs. They never really looked to be in a lot of trouble against Nashville, and are on the verge of sweeping Minnesota in the second round. Corey Crawford has settled in net to give the team some stability in their goaltending, Patrick Kane looks like Playoff Patrick Kane, and the top line of Marian Hossa, Jonathan Toews, and Brandon Saad has probably been the best so far these playoffs (sorry, Anaheim). As just a fan of hockey, watching Hossa/Toews/Saad is about as good as it gets. The age gaps between the players are obvious, and a nice talking point, though Hossa looks to be playing as good a game as he ever has.
****
The low scoring continued in the Capitals/Rangers series, as Washington took Game 4 by a 2-1 margin. The Rangers scored three goals in a Game 2 win, and have scored two goals in their three losses. They're having a fairly similar run to that of Montreal, and are shooting just 4.4-percent as a team in this series.
One storyline that has pushed itself to the forefront is obviously Washington goalie Braden Holtby. He was tied for seventh in save percentage in the regular season (with Vezina Trophy finalist Pekka Rinne), and had 41 wins. The year before, Holtby had seven games where he allowed at least five goals (in 48 appearances). This past year, he had zero games where he allowed at least five goals (73 appearances, all taken from Hockey Reference). He now has a .950 save percentage in the postseason.
On the topic of Holtby, where does he rank next year in a one-year league among goalies? There are questions about other goalies like Tuukka Rask and Pekka Rinne (check Rinne's second half numbers). Is Holtby an unquestioned top-5 goalie? Part of Holtby not allowing five goals in a game this year is improved team defense from the Caps. Does that repeat? Will Mike Green be back? At least there's time until next season to figure this out.
****
Rick Nash is going to get ragged on for not scoring, it's unavoidable with what he did (or didn't do) last year in the playoffs. There was a nice montage though on the Sportsnet feed of Nash back-checking hard and creating chances. Stamkos is having his struggles, so Nash isn’t the only star not doing much on the score sheet. There are other ways to help your team win hockey games though, and Nash is at least doing that. His team is at the point where they need more now, though.
****