Sunday, June 28, 2015
Ian Gooding
2015-06-28
Dougie Hamilton fallout, draft analysis, goalies on the move, and more…
There was a ton of talk on Friday as to why the Bruins would allow Dougie Hamilton to get away. I'll get into what I think was the Bruins' rationale here in a moment, but I don't think enough is being discussed on the Calgary side of things.
I have no argument with Clifford’s or Parker’s analysis about Hamilton's fantasy value not increasing with a move to Calgary. After all, that is now a very deep defense in Calgary, and Hamilton would appear to be projected for second-pairing minutes with the Flames.
On the Flames' defense, you now have Hamilton, Mark Giordano, TJ Brodie, Dennis Wideman, and Kris Russell all vying for top-4 minutes (assuming another move is not in the works in Calgary). Potentially, you have a minute-munching defenseman like Russell (nearly 24 minutes last season) who could move down to the bottom pairing. That is huge because Russell set the single-season shot blocking record last season with 274, and we know how many fantasy leagues now count blocked shots.
Russell was impressive in the playoffs last season, particularly in the Flames' first-round series against Vancouver. So maybe it's TJ Brodie who moves down the ladder. You may remember that Brodie was on fire during the first half of last season (21 points in his first 25 games), but tailed off dramatically after that.
*
As for my theory about what went on in Boston yesterday, the biggest issue entering the day for the Bruins was the salary cap. I believe Cam Neely was pushing hard to move Lucic, with his hometown team the Canucks being one of the teams calling about him (despite their own salary cap issues).
When that wasn't happening as quickly as the Bruins wanted, perhaps that's when the vultures moved in and started making the panicked Bruins offers on Hamilton, who was becoming more vulnerable to getting offer sheeted. And I agree with Ramblings commentor donpaulo yesterday, who thought that the Bruins simply took what was a better offer from the Flames than what would have been on an offer sheet. (More on the details on what that would be in The Contrarian.) Then after the Hamilton trade was made, the Kings made an offer for Lucic that the Bruins simply couldn't refuse.
To me, what happened yesterday just goes to show how suddenly a team's plans can change on crazy days such as draft day, free agent frenzy day, and trade deadline day. A possibility that was being tossed around a fair bit after the two Bruins' trades was that the Bruins weren't done – that two of the first-round picks would be shipped off to Arizona for the number 3 pick and the right to pick local defenseman Noah Hanifin. Obviously that didn't happen, and the Bruins made an unprecedented three consecutive picks in the first round.
*
In last weekend's Ramblings, I mentioned that I thought teams would draft for size again. That was true to some degree yesterday, with the Coyotes picking Dylan Strome at number 3. (Hey, I got my first three picks right! After that, not so much.) As well, we saw 175 lb. Mathew Barzal fall to number 16 (I like the trade and pick for the Islanders), although missing half the season due to injury seemed to really take a hit on Barzal's draft stock.
But one player who I thought really fell was 6'4", 215 lb. Lawson Crowse, who was drafted number 11 by the host Florida Panthers. How often have we seen the bigger player drafted first? Crowse would have been a top 10 pick – maybe even a top 5 pick – in other seasons. But that's also a factor of this really deep draft.
The Leafs were criticized a little for the somewhat surprising Mitch Marner pick, considering that they also picked a smaller forward in the first round last season in William Nylander. But we're seeing the NHL turn into more of a smaller player's game. If you're a Leafs' fan worried about his slight build (5'11", 160 lbs. – perhaps even considered a generous measurement at that), then keep in mind an interesting tidbit that I heard on one of the draft shows this week: Marner's mother is 5'11" herself, meaning that this kid may not be finished growing. In addition, Marner's brother also had a late growth spurt (Metro News).
When Mitch was 12, he and his father were featured in a CBC News report about hockey parents. Is Mr. Marner an overboard hockey dad, or does this reflect what is needed nowadays for a kid to get to the NHL? With my son closing in on the age in which I started minor hockey, the costs mentioned in this video frighten me if he ever decides he wants to play minor hockey. (Dig Mr. Marner’s hat too… it’s so Canadian.)
Of course, if you want much, much more on prospects, you need to get yourself Dobber's 2015 Prospects Report. You've got all summer to read it too.
*
Neil Parker really took care of you on Saturday with all his Fantasy Takes on the goaltending merry-go-round. So there's probably not a lot that I can add that hasn't already been said. My own general thoughts, though, are based on the number of goalie timeshares that we could be looking at next season.
It is clearly a buyers' market for goalies this offseason, as many teams don't believe in the idea of having one elite goalie, or more specifically, one goalie taking up massive cap space. In fact, more of the goalies being moved on Saturday seemed to decrease in fantasy value rather than increase. But remember that the weaker teams are more likely to need goalies than the stronger teams.
*
An interesting stat brought up by user Loch in the Forum … Cam Ward faced fewer shots per 60 minutes than Eddie Lack (26.8 to 31.0). The Canes aren't perceived as a strong defensive team, but bringing in James Wisniewski and possibly Hanifin alongside the underrated Justin Faulk may help this rebuilding team to some degree.
Cam Ward will still start at least 50 percent of the time, given the equity he has built as the Canes' starting goalie. But Lack wasn't brought in simply to be the backup, so think of this as a 1A and a 1B situation. The thing about Lack, though, is that he seems to play better when he is handed a long run of starts, as he was in Vancouver during the later part of both the 2013-14 and 2014-15 seasons.
All in all, a timeshare on a non-playoff team means that I'm staying away from either goalie until the late rounds of single-season drafts.
*
The Dallas situation is interesting. Assuming GM Jim Nill is able to sign Antti Niemi, the Stars are also looking at a straight-down-the-middle timeshare situation, possibly to the point where the two Finns take turns in net. Two proven goalies on a team that might make the playoffs means that this is at least a better timeshare situation than Carolina, but it's still not ideal.
What makes this one unique, though, is that the Stars could potentially have $10+ million in cap space taken up by their goalies. This was the very reason that the Canucks wanted to trade Lack – because Ryan Miller is already being paid $6 million a season and Lack would be looking for something in the neighborhood of $4 million per.
Either way, if you're in a keeper league and you own either goalie, his fantasy value just decreased. Again, this assumes that the Stars sign Niemi by Wednesday. If not, then Kari Lehtonen's value is back to square one. But if the Stars can't sign Niemi, then they might then pursue another half-decent goalie.
On the other hand, maybe the Stars also consider shopping Lehtonen. His contract (three years left at $5.9 million) can't be easy to move, though.
*
The Anaheim situation is confusing. Adding Khudobin makes for a crowded goal crease, with Frederik Andersen and John Gibson already there. Andersen is probably still the starter, but what is going to happen with Gibson? Perhaps he is dealt, but at this time last year he was thought to be the Ducks' goalie of the future.
As for Talbot, he'll get the starts in Edmonton, but he's a very risky proposition fantasy-wise. The blueline could improve with the additions of Griffin Reinhart and Darnell Nurse next season, but any Oilers' goalie might still be another year or two away from being a strong fantasy asset.
Lastly, who's going to play in goal in San Jose? Maybe we find out July 1. Or maybe they'll try to bring Arturs Irbe out of retirement.
*
A hot-button topic in last Sunday's Ramblings was Mike Ribeiro. The only thing I have to add today is a report that perhaps flew under the radar this week about him rejecting the Predators' latest contract offer (Sportsnet). So perhaps there is a market for him in spite of what is currently going on with him. My guess is that some team will reach out to him, and he'll get signed shortly after July 1. Maybe I'm being too idealistic, but why couldn't you be loyal to the team that took a chance on you after your market value nearly flatlined? Rhetorical question, I suppose.
*
This whole Chris Pronger salary trade is exactly what is wrong with the new cap situation. I'm not enough of a lawyer to know how to fix it, but does this kind of thing go on in any other sport? If it doesn't, then maybe the league should do something about it. Legally, is there an assumption that players like Pronger, Marc Savard, and Nathan Horton could come back and play again, even if a doctor says that they won't? I know why the loophole is there, but honestly it looks silly. It's one of those things that I'll put some more thought into how to solve later. But maybe you have some ideas. Tell me below if you do.
Until next time, thanks for reading.