Ramblings: My take on the 2018 Top 5 Draft picks, Sunday’s action and more (Apr 30)
Dobber
2018-04-29
Ramblings: My take on the 2018 Top 5 Draft picks, Sunday’s action and more (Apr 30)
***
I had planned to provide in-depth commentary on what Rasmus Dahlin will mean to his new team the Buffalo Sabres, but after reading Ian’s take yesterday (here) there is really nothing more to add. I think he nailed it. The Cole’s notes: don’t expect immediate miracles; do expect Rasmus Ristolainen to lose PP time but improve his plus/minus; do expect Dahlin to round into a top-scoring NHL defenseman eventually.
So let’s discuss Andrei Svechnikov’s impact on the Hurricanes. This team will already have two of the following three prospects making the jump: Martin Necas, Warren Foegele and Valentin Zykov. All three impressed during cups of coffee this past season, but I don’t believe an established team like Carolina will have four rookie forwards. I think you can cap it at two and maybe a third rookie join in the middle of the season. If all three of them just won’t be denied, I think there’s a chance that Svechnikov could be this year’s Jonathan Drouin. That is to say, there is a chance that he just rips up junior for another season and makes the jump a year later. That risk exists – he’s not a shoe-in. The ‘Canes will be saying goodbye to Lee Stempniak and possibly Derek Ryan. Joakim Nordstrom is an RFA but I wonder if he’s even worth qualifying, given the talent that’s on the way. If Svechnikov makes the team, my hunch is that he won’t be shooting out the lights en route to a 60-point Calder-worthy season. Instead, something conservative in the mid-40s. This is just the wrong team for him to make an early impact – Montreal would have been better for first-year results.
So the Habs are looking at Quinn Hughes, a lefty rearguard with high-end wheels who can run a power play. Just what the doctor ordered for this team. And despite all the jokes going around the Internet – Marc Bergevin has learned his lesson about trading young high-end defensemen. He’ll keep this one. Normally I would say, on about 20 other teams, that they would push to get him signed and turn pro. One thing to keep in mind here is that Quinn’s younger brother Jack is looking to play for Michigan and so the possibility of playing a year with his brother is a factor here. But that aside, many teams would push for him to turn pro and put him straight on their team. Montreal? Look at Mikhail Sergachev and Noah Juulsen – both players had to go back to their respective leagues for at least another year. Would the Habs guarantee a roster spot to Hughes? With that track record I wonder. And without the guarantee, the temptation to play a year with his brother may be too tempting.
*
After the Top 3, the next two are likely either Filip Zadina (RW) and Adam Boqvist (RHD), at least according to Cam Robinson’s wonderful draft ranking. He has Zadina ranked fourth, but since it’s Ottawa’s pick and Erik Karlsson is likely entering his final season there (I’m not yet ready to commit to his being dealt at the Draft, I think it will be midseason), it’s time to draft the heir-apparent. And before we say that “he could never produce anything close to Karlsson”, keep in mind that Boqvist is only 17 years old. So his potential is through the roof. We won’t truly get a handle on his ceiling for another two years, so far all we know he could be exactly that. Hell, we didn’t think this 18-year-old kid drafted 15th overall in 2008 could produce what Erik Karlsson is producing either. But that actually was Erik Karlsson! Given Boqvist’s age, he will season in the SHL for a year and make the jump in 2019-20. A seamless transition from the Karlsson era to the Boqvist era?
Ottawa fans – you slipped from second down to fourth. But to be honest, I like this fourth pick for your team a lot better. You can take solace in that. Yes you can. Shut up, you can. Trust me.
That leaves Zadina for Arizona at five. After the Top 3, I don’t think any of the players make the jump next season. I’m not saying none will – I’m only saying I wouldn’t bet on it, even if the odds were very favourable.
*
You can get all the deets on prospects in my Fantasy Prospects Report, which is out on June 1 and available for presale this coming Tuesday. I’m writing over 190 of the player profiles myself, with Peter Harling, Cam Robinson and 14 other writers filling in the other 300 or so drafted and draft-eligible players. From a fantasy hockey standpoint. If you’re in a keeper league, I don’t know how you do without this.
*
One thing the Penguins can do to stop the Capitals is to ask Matt Murray to stop giving up a goal two seconds in all the time. At least, that’s what it seems like. Just 1:26 into Sunday’s game, and I believe it was 17 seconds into the first game. Murray gave up a goal 2:15 into the sixth game against the Flyers, too.
Lars Eller picked up three assists and now has five points in eight games. That puts him sixth on the team in scoring. Not a bad little throw-in I grabbed in February just for the playoff help, and will drop in September.
The stars have come to play for the Caps in these playoffs – Alex Ovechkin, Evgeny Kuznetsov, Nicklas Backstrom and John Carlson each have more than a point per game. And Braden Holtby is boasting a 1.95 GAA and 0.932 SV% in seven games. There can’t be any complaints in that department, the stars are shining. It’s the postseason, so points-per-game averages generally drop. But these stars have each watched those averages rise and the goaltender’s numbers are great. If they lose the series, they just got beat by a better team.
I noticed Zach Aston-Reese a lot in the game. Was surprised to see he had just 7:35 of ice time, as I would have guessed 12 or 13 minutes easily. He was noticeable in a good way. He had three SOG and four Hits, each good for second among forwards. Plus a blocked shot. I wonder if he can steal Conor Sheary’s spot? They deserve to swap. Playoff hockey is not for little Sheary at all.
Brian Dumoulin left the game after taking this hit from Tom Wilson. He is questionable for Game 3:
If Dumoulin is out, Jamie Oleksiak will take over as Kris Letang’s D partner and Matt Hunwick will draw back into the lineup.
Evgeni Malkin practiced with the Penguins and was on their PP unit Saturday. So he’s clearly very close to returning.
*
Pekka Rinne stopped 46 of 50 shots to help Nashville win in double OT. The Jets tied it with a minute left. I bring this up because the Jets managed only 19 shots in the first game, so they were no longer stifled.
Nashville needs to put a guy on Brandon Tanev. Scoring machine! Seriously though, as if the Jets don’t have enough firepower now they have one of their depth guys putting pucks in the net. Tanev has goals in three straight games.
Mathieu Perreault is closing in a return to action and I suspect we will see him in Game 3. He was knocked out of the first game of the playoffs with a UBI.
The Victor Arvidsson – Ryan Johansen – Filip Forsberg line struck for eight points. Now that his sophomore campaign is over, one which I consider a “slump”, I expect Arvidsson to have a big year next season. Jake Guentzel is another one – these guys are coming off weak seasons (versus expectations) and I think in 2018-19 they meet those expectations.
*
The Jacob Josefson era is finally over. He signed to play in the SHL next season. Initially had promise – I remember a guy in my league held him in such high regard he practically built a shrine for him. But injuries happened to him at the worst time, plus he was probably rushed into the NHL. And that stunted whatever potential he had.
*
And finally, huge announcement: Eric Daoust has now made live the amazing player profile pages. I invite you to click a name above and see the NEW easy-to-navigate profile pages. These have all the info you need to research a player quickly for your fantasy hockey league. It really does have it all – and now the info is easy to sift through and lightning-quick to load. We're only just getting started – this summer is going to see lots of great upgrades and fixes to the Dobber Sports Network!
*
See you next week
14 Comments
Leave A Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The Capitals were handed this game!!! Vrana’s goal was goalie interference… and Hornqvist’s goal was clearly behind the line!!! Total BS… I give Sullivan alot of credit for keeping his cool.
Do we really need another lesson in the Parallax effect?
The image which showed it as a goal was from a camera angle shooting from an angle, not directly overhead and so can’t be used to determine whether it was over the line. While I admit on this one, because it seemed like it was fully behind the bar, might still in fact have been in, you can’t fault the situation room, because they could not use that camera angle to overturn the call and the overhead view was blocked because the puck was under holtby’s blocker. I thought that it was the right call to uphold the call on the ice there- not enough evidence to overturn.
In case you need a little more- here’s a handy video from a view years ago when this same thing happened to the Flames in the playoffs to explain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSG8mzwwOs8
Sure. The main issue, however, is that the goal on Sunday was not waved off. It wasn’t acknowledged. The play was just whistled down as if Holtby smothered the puck.
So in this instance, they weren’t overturning the on-ice call, they were actually to make the call. And the call was – “goal”
When the ref announced it to the fans, however, he said that the call on the ice would stand. Which was a mistake on his part – there was no call on the ice. He did not wave off that goal. If he called “no goal” then sure, I’m with the replay officials – not enough to overturn. But was it enough to call it the puck in when the ref didn’t decide it either way? Yes, I believe so.
Ahh, that was my bad then. I assumed when he said they upheld the call on the ice that they had called it no goal- I’ll admit I was watching with the sound down very low as my kid was napping so I never realized there was no call on the ice.
Love the new player profile, very clean. I do miss the quarterly breakdown however, as this was very helpful to see player trending and season split stats. It would be great if this could be brought back. Now I have to copy the game log, add fields and pivot to accomplish the same view.
Please explain in more detail how to accomplish this, since I too am a big user of that feature and wasn’t able to replicate it
We’ll bring this back, thanks for the suggestion. Rick, his method involves pasting the game log into Excel and then using a pivot table to sum it up by quarter.
While we’re at it, I think it would be great if there was a way to compare quarters from different seasons. For example a player’s Q4 16/17 vs Q4 17/18 or Q1 17/18 vs Q4 17/18. Or even better, compare Q4 from last 5 seasons. I remember that a couple years ago I did such research for Wennberg who was hot in H1 and Monahan who was slumping. When I figured out that Monahan is notorious for strong H2, I pulled the trigger on a one-for-one trade and it won me the championship.
Basically, you would have to add a filter for quarters in the Career Stats section. That way you don’t have to go filtering each year to find out the player’s trends.
Amazing, I figured you guys would keep the feature so was surprised to see it gone. And you’re bang on, the game log is in a format that copies and pastes cleanly in Excel. I insert a few columns to define month and pre post Dec 31 as new year is a clean midpoint for players playing full season. Copy data, insert table, insert pivot, set your fields. I’d be happy to help you out with this!
You know how in Jerry Macguire the line is “you had me at hello?” Well you lost me at Excel……
Just spoke to Eric – quarterly breakdowns will be back and they’ll have filters by year, and year vs. year comparison.
Also, the buy/sell meters will return but with some re-thinking (i.e. will be better at recommending when a player is too hot or cold). These shouldn’t take too long
Carolina is a weird situation now. The owner appears to be meddling wing nut. His 1st order of business upon taking full control of his new toy was to essentially fire Francis as GM moving him up & out of hockey operations, a terrible decision. Francis has done a great job of cleaning up the mess Rutherford left. Every new possible GM contacted by the new owner has so far has declined the opportunity as few want to work with an owner that thinks he has the skills to run his toy actively.
I had the same feelings about Tor when they added Matthew’s, Marner, Zaitsev & essentially Nylander all at the start of the 2016-17 season. I felt there was only room for 2 forwards, but that said I agree with you as team make up & another pending expansion make it virtually impossible for who ever Carolina selects at #2 to enter the NHL next season.
If Seattle is being added in 2 years but no later than the next lock out this enters the equation. If not addressed before the season starts then Carolina will bury that pick to make sure it doesn’t cost them a player in the next round of expansion. All part of the business side of hockey, waivers, arbitration rights, etc. being some of the others. Zykov plays for sure as he has to clear waivers, but other than Foegele & Necas you also have Kukkonen who really impressed me in the preseason & his cup of coffee in the NHL. Saarela also appears to be very close to NHL ready.
If the Darling signing had only worked & Peter’s pulled his head out of his ass with certain players specifically Skinner, Carolina would have been a playoff team this past season. I’m not a huge fan of analytics but when the #’s show that when Skinner & William’s are on the ice together they dominate the competition in scoring chances I don’t buck & ignore that data. Peter’s virtually refused to play them together, mind boggling.
The situation in Carolina now is starting to show similarities to Edm & Buf, this instability is going to effect the on ice product & a team that was about to step up significantly if they get a #1 goalie may not or may go on a serious roller-coaster ride for the next few seasons. Good 1 season bad the next.
This would be a great landing spot for Halak, Carolina can’t afford to risk that Darling is gong to be a sieve again this year. I hated that signing. Not that they traded a 3rd for him but that they gave an unproven goalie 4 years at 4.15 was insane & whoever sold that bill of goods deserves to be fired. Francis was in charge & someone suggested such to him from their scouting department. He certainly bore the brunt having the final call on such.
It’s a coin toss for me as to which Dman is being selected after Dahlin. Bouchard, Hughes, Dobson or Boqvist. I don’t follow prospects very closely before they reach the NHL so I rely on you guys, McKenzie, Button, The Hockey News, ISS, Central Scouting & I don’t really prognosticate just follow with interest. I have the odd preference but don’t truly care who goes where even with my own team Bos.
Great to have you back.
I realize that this is all conjecture, but I think that Montreal will be much more likely to take Zadina than Hughes.
Yeah, sure, they need LHD after Birdbrain Bergie basically wiped the roster clean at that position, but they were also one of the lowest scoring teams in the League and have been for years.
Zadina could step right in, apparently, he’s that good.
Bergevin’s neck is really on the line in Montreal – and he’ll be much more inclined to be looking at more immediate results than Hughes.
As well the Montreal PP – thanks to Kirk Muller – was, I believe, 12th in the League.
Pacciorety will be traded to obtain either the top 6 C or a high end LHD.
There is also the consideration that Carolina may opt for Zadina at #2, given his familiarity with Carolina’s last year #1 choice, his countryman Martin Neckas who is a top line Center.
Finally – I very, very, very much doubt that Tkachuk falls to # 9.
You may not like him personally – but he does have more certainty than many other players.
He will be a player in the NHL
rich
rattus rattus