July 2, 2015
Michael Clifford
2015-07-02
Kessel is in Pittsburgh, Beleskey goes to Boston, Edmonton is starting to look like a hockey team, and Detroit loads up for a Cup run.
****
Be sure to check out all the pieces in the fantasy impact section for all the trade and signing information and analysis. The Dobber team has done a great job on staying current on the goings-on in the NHL over the last week.
I’ll have more on last night’s/today’s moves as the day progresses. Also, I’ll have my regular thread in the Dobber Forums for any fantasy and non-fantasy hockey question the readers may have.
****
No reason to start anywhere else than in Pittsburgh, where the Penguins traded prospect defenceman Scott Harrington, prospect forward Kasperi Kapanen, Nick Spaling, and a first and third round draft pick next year to Toronto for Phil Kessel, minor leaguer Tyler Biggs, defenceman Tim Erixon, and a second round pick. The Leafs are also retaining 15-percent of Kessel's annual cap hit, which is important for Pittsburgh because of their existing cap issues.
What this does is give Crosby a true sniper to consistently play with for the first time in his career. That's not hyperbole: since 2007, Bill Guerin is Crosby's third-most used winger at five-on-five. Guerin retired five years ago.
It also gives Kessel a true first line centre to consistently play with for the first time in his career (though he did very well with Nazem Kadri in a relatively small sample). That's also important to note here: Tyler Bozak loses Kessel as a line mate, and that pretty much kills Bozak's fantasy value in non-deep formats. Bozak's points per 60 minutes at five-on-five without Kessel on his line over the last five years is 1.19 (over 783 minutes). That's worse than Drew Miller or Nick Spaling. Bozak could struggle to crack 40 points, and be a big minus player (again).
On to more pleasant thoughts, like Kessel playing with Crosby.
I know it's still kind of up in the air as to who exactly Kessel will end up playing with, but I can't imagine Pittsburgh makes a move of this magnitude to not give Crosby an elite winger. So just how well can Kessel do?
Think about it this way: Kessel managed 23 points in his 524:11 career minutes and seconds played with Nazem Kadri. For a full Kessel season (say 1275 minutes), that's 55-56 points. Add 20 power play points, and Kessel is a 75 point player. That's with Kadri. He was a better than a point per game from 2011-2014 overall.
Crosby (obviously) can drive up the shooting percentage of any player. Given that Kessel was due for a rebound anyway, I don't see why he's not a 40-goal and point per game player barring disaster. I'm curious to see how long they stay together, and if Kessel has upside beyond that. Saying I expect him to push for 50 goals is not a likely scenario, but if he did finish with 50 goals, I wouldn't be shocked. Again, that's upside, not expectation.
I know this trade involves several pieces, but the most fantasy-relevant one right now is Kessel. This seems to be the perfect pairing for Pittsburgh's top line, and would also free up Malkin from tough matchups. This will be dissected for years to come, but obviously this is a trade made with the next few years in mind.
For Leafs fans that will miss him (and you should), here's every goal Kessel scored in the 2013-2014 season. Hoo boy this is going to be fun to watch next year.
Matt Beleskey had been pegged as a possible David Clarkson contract of 2015, but the Bruins managed to sign him to a five-year deal at $3.8-million per season for a cap hit. The coverage on TSN in Canada talked about how Beleskey was looking for a seven-year deal (which, I mean, may as well aim high), and I was personally expecting a higher cap hit than that. It's obvious that the free agent market was soft on him, as it seems NHL general managers are starting to do their research a little bit better.
Beleskey is coming off a career year, which screams "CLARKSON BICKELL BOLLAND" to anybody that can process thoughts. He doubled (22) his previous career-high goal total for a single season (11), and that was due to an abnormally high shooting percentage.
This seems to be a signing to replace Milan Lucic of sorts. And yes, it was a career year for Beleskey by a fair margin. It should be noted, though, that this was the first year Beleskey averaged over 13 minutes per game (and it was still just 14:29). In fact, his goals per 60 minutes at five-on-five over the last three years (1.06) is higher than a lot of elite players like Kessel, Ovechkin, and Pavelski. He could repeat as a 20-goal scorer simply through playing an extra 2-3 minutes a game (and staying healthy for the whole season). He also shoots more per minute than guys like Taylor Hall, Bobby Ryan, and Henrik Zetterberg.
I know his numbers are worse away playing away from Getzlaf, but I doubt he's going to Boston to play on the third line. It's not like going to play with either David Krejci or Patrice Bergeron is a fall off the cliff. If Beleskey can play 80 games in Boston's top-six, he pushes 20 goals again.
****
Edmonton signed Andrej Sekera to a six-year deal worth $5.5-million per season. This was a major signing for this team. Sekera is the player the previous regime thought Andrew Ference was when they signed him. No matter what underlying stat that is looked at, Sekera is a top pairing guy. I would expect him to play 23-24 minutes a game, anchoring a potentially young defence corps (at least certain pieces).
Sekera is coming off a year where his teams' on-ice shooting percentage (6.83) was nearly a full percent lower than his previous career low (7.75 in 2008-2009). That has to rebound, which means I don't expect a repeat of his 23 point season. With a lot of ice time, and a much-improved roster, I can see Sekera pushing 40 points this year.
The one concern is health – Sekera has never played 80 games in a season. Also, he doesn't stuff peripheral stats, so even with a 40 point season, Sekera may not be a top-25 defenceman. I'm optimistic about his potential this year, but expectations need to be tempered. I think Sekera has more value in a points-only league than a roto league. In either format, I don't think he'll be ranked inside my top-25 d-men.
****
Edmonton is starting to round out a real team. The Marincin trade is still a bit of a head-scratcher (he could have been a cheap third pairing defenceman), but with Sekera, Cam Talbot in net, Mark Letestu providing centre depth, not to mention a certain kid named Connor, this franchise is headed in the right direction. I feel like I've said it before, but this shouldn be a team that can flirt with a playoff spot.
****
Detroit is realizing their window is closing, and made a couple of win-now signings. The team added defenceman Mike Green for three years at a cap hit of $6-million per year. That should help maintain an elite power play like the Red Wings had last year. It also provides insurance if Niklas Kronwall slides at all (though Green's injury history doesn't provide a lot of comfort).
They also gave Brad Richards a one-year deal for $3-million. That gives them centre depth that was missing at times last year (I'm as big a Riley Sheahan fan you'll find, but I'm not sure he's ready for consistent top-six minutes just yet).
Green was a top-20 roto defenceman last year, and he's averaged more points per game over the last three years than names like Shattenkirk, Pietrangelo, and Ekman-Larsson. It may be a pipe dream, but if Green can play 80 games, he can push for 50 points. This is a defenceman I'll have ranked inside my top-25 for next year in roto leagues.
*Information taken from Hockey Analysis, Hockey Reference, Behind The Net, and General Fanager.