Tuesday, June 9
Neil Parker
2015-06-09
Game 3, Victor Hedman’s ascent and more …
***
It doesn’t seem necessary to dig too deep into Game 3. The Lightning, and perhaps most significantly, Ben Bishop, weathered the storm when needed and found a way to score one more goal than Chicago. In a game that could have easily gone the other way, it didn’t.
Maybe I’m wrong on this point, but while Chicago was dominating the play, they were kept to the outside for the most part. Their scoring chances weren’t endless or high-end, and at no point did Bishop absolutely stand on his head.
That said, there were two missed nets with a wide-open cage, and Brandon Saad had a glorious chance in tight on a two-on-one rush with Marian Hossa. Still, it seemed like Tampa Bay were able to block or deflect a lot of pucks with a stick or body.
What gave the impression of Chicago’s dominance was their puck control and puck movement in the offensive zone, but again, it seemed like Tampa Bay clogged up the shooting lanes. And for the most part, the Lightning were able to stay disciplined and in position and not give up too many second chances.
It would likely be unfair to say Tampa Bay stole Game 3, but the series could very easily be 2-1 Blackhawks, too.
***
Ben Bishop looked extremely uncomfortable at times, and injured, but at the end of the game, he made all the big saves and allowed one fewer goal than his opposing netminder.
How much longer does Don Cherry have with Coach’s Corner?
I don’t watch faithfully, because those are precious minutes between periods to catch up on other scoreboards and whatnot. But when he had the top prospects on last night, it reinforced just how prominent he has been and for how long.
I couldn’t dig up too many old clips, but it feels like Don has been doing this since the 1900 draft with Owen Nolan, Petr Nedved, Keith Primeau and Mike Ricci. Maybe not or maybe it has been even longer.
Details? Anyone know?
There were some tough years for Don, but for the most part when he sticks to hockey, there is always an entertainment quality to add to his hockey take. If nothing else, Coach’s Corner has become part of the hockey experience for Canadians, and his prospects interview Monday reinforced that again for me.
To hammer home a point, who were the New York Rangers Conn Smythe candidates?
Derick Brassard lead the team in scoring and had an excellent playoff run, but surely he doesn’t cut it.
Whipping-boy Rick Nash finished second in scoring with 14 points, but obviously, he isn’t a candidate. Henrik Lundqvist is the team’s most valuable player by a significant margain, but he lost four of six with a .895 save percentage to be eliminated from the playoffs.
My point, which has been contested, is the Rangers might have a run left in them. However, they don’t have that player who is capable of scoring 13 seconds after a goal to tie the game, ala the Palat-Johnson-Nikita Kucherov last night. They don’t have a go-to player, and when was the last time a team won a Stanley Cup without one?
Last season, Ryan McDonagh warranted Conn Smythe consideration alongside Henrik Lundqvist, but this year, the Rangers got through on a solid team game built around defense. At the end of the day, you need more than that, and in consecutive years, they came short.
They don’t have the star power, and unless Kevin Hayes or Chris Kreider suddenly becomes that guy, they’ll continue to be an excellent but not great team. Nash, Brassard and Derek Stepan are similar, they’re excellent hockey players, but they’re not Conn Smythe candidates.
It isn’t a dig at the Rangers, it is just an unbiased take after watching their shortcomings. After all, I expected them to win the Stanley Cup this season.
***
Robby Fabbri and Ty Rattie both have a legitimate shot to make the St. Louis Blues opening night roster next season, and given the offensive dynamo they’ll be joining, both are worth keeping tabs on during camp.
There are talks of a major shakeup happening with St. Louis, and there likely should be one. So Fabbri and Rattie are interesting replacements for the Blues or trade chips.
Last week, Robin Lehner‘s fantasy value was questioned, and since, it has been suggested he would warrant a top-six forward in return. Or at least, that is what the Senators are asking for.
But back to Niemi, he has been an excellent to reliable goalie for six years, with the 2014-15 season being his worst campaign. It would also be fair to chalk it up to a disastrous season from the Sharks as a whole, at least in part.
Niemi has proven to be incredibly streaky, and when he is on, he is a fringe No. 1 fantasy option. The majority of the time, he is a mid-range No. 2. It is largely assumed he won’t return to the Sharks, so depending on where he lands, his fantasy value hangs in the balance.
A speculative add in a keeper/dyntasy format in hopes Niemi swims in more friendly waters during the 2015-16 season isn’t out of the question. The asking price shouldn’t be overly steep.